Contact information

Omar mukhtar st, Gaza, Palestine

We are available 24/ 7. Contact us Now. +970657681773
Follow us

After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures throughout Europe, fresh technologies are actually reviving these kinds of systems. Via lie recognition tools analyzed at the boundary to a system for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of solutions is being made use of in asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their particular capacity to understand these devices and to pursue their legal right for proper protection.

It also demonstrates how these types of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They help in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering all of them from getting at the programs of safety. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of those technologies, through which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects just who are disciplined by their reliability on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article states that these systems have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double effect: when they assist with expedite the asylum method, they also make it difficult for refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Need a successful project?

Lets Work Together

Contact us
  • right image
  • Left Image